How do they compare?
SecureTrust Cyber vs iboss
iboss delivers SASE for the mid-market, but SIEM, patch and AI security are missing from the platform.
iboss is a credible SASE option for mid-market teams. The gap is the same one across the market: security operations and AI security are not part of the platform.
Security ops are separate
iboss stops at secure access. SIEM, vulnerability management and patching are still separate products from separate vendors.
Point products, not a platform
You stitch together SWG, CASB, ZTNA and DLP from different modules, each with its own console and policy.
Shadow AI is an afterthought
AI Security for End Users is missing or bolted on, leaving GenAI usage ungoverned.
Add-on pricing
Core capabilities are gated behind tiers and add-ons, so the price climbs as you turn features on.
Why SecureTrust Cyber
Three reasons teams choose SecureTrust Cyber over iboss
Operations included
SIEM, vulnerability detection and managed patch come with the platform.
AI security built in
Shadow AI governance is native, not an afterthought.
One support relationship
One vendor, one console, one support team across SASE and operations.
How do we compare?
SecureTrust Cyber vs iboss 2026
| Capability | SecureTrust Cyber | iboss |
|---|---|---|
| Firewall-as-a-Service | Available | Available |
| Intrusion Prevention System | Available | Available |
| DNS Security | Available | Available |
| Secure Web Gateway | Available | Available |
| Universal ZTNA | Available | Available |
| CASB | Available | Available |
| Data Loss Prevention | Available | Available |
| AI Security for End Users | Available | Not available |
| SIEM Platform | Available | Not available |
| Managed Patch Management | Available | Not available |
Adding operations to SASE?
Keep SASE and add the operations layer in the same platform.
FAQ
About the comparison
Is SecureTrust Cyber comparable to iboss on SASE?
Comparison last verified: 2026-09-29.
See the difference for yourself
A 30-minute demo against your own environment.