How do they compare?
SecureTrust Cyber vs Cisco Secure Access
Cisco Umbrella is strong at DNS, but the SASE pieces are a patchwork of acquisitions that still leave operations separate.
Cisco Secure Access builds on Umbrella’s strong DNS foundation, but the SASE story is assembled across acquired products. For teams that want a natively integrated platform, that matters.
Assembled, not integrated
DNS, SWG and CASB come from different products stitched together.
No security operations
SIEM and patch are separate products, often from other vendors.
Enterprise licensing
Pricing is built for large Cisco estates with complex licensing.
Shadow AI gap
AI Security for End Users is not part of the offering.
Why SecureTrust Cyber
Three reasons teams choose SecureTrust Cyber over Cisco Secure Access
Natively integrated platform
Every capability shares one agent, one console and one policy engine.
Operations included
SIEM and managed patch are part of the same platform, not bolt-ons.
AI security built in
Govern Shadow AI from the same console as the rest of security.
How do we compare?
SecureTrust Cyber vs Cisco Secure Access 2026
| Capability | SecureTrust Cyber | Cisco Secure Access |
|---|---|---|
| Firewall-as-a-Service | Available | Not available |
| Intrusion Prevention System | Available | Not available |
| DNS Security | Available | Available |
| Secure Web Gateway | Available | Available |
| Universal ZTNA | Available | Available |
| CASB | Available | Available |
| Data Loss Prevention | Available | Available |
| AI Security for End Users | Available | Not available |
| SIEM Platform | Available | Not available |
| Managed Patch Management | Available | Not available |
Simplifying a Cisco-heavy stack?
Consolidate DNS, SASE and operations into one platform.
FAQ
About the comparison
Can SecureTrust Cyber replace Cisco Umbrella?
Comparison last verified: 2026-09-29.
See the difference for yourself
A 30-minute demo against your own environment.